<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: [Dynatrace SaaS] Why is failure rate higher than 100%? in Alerting</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Dynatrace-SaaS-Why-is-failure-rate-higher-than-100/m-p/120234#M1584</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It appears that you have the Unit set to Percent, and the aggregations are set to auto, sum. I suspect that the system is looking at your percentages then adding them up to give you a value over 100% &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 19:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-04T19:14:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>[Dynatrace SaaS] Why is failure rate higher than 100%?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Dynatrace-SaaS-Why-is-failure-rate-higher-than-100/m-p/120233#M1583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We discovered today that our failure rate anomaly detection based on a custom metric was frequently higher than 100%. Can someone explain me why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/27759-1609779193550.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Dynatrace-SaaS-Why-is-failure-rate-higher-than-100/m-p/120233#M1583</guid>
      <dc:creator>jalecrim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-04T16:53:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Dynatrace SaaS] Why is failure rate higher than 100%?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Dynatrace-SaaS-Why-is-failure-rate-higher-than-100/m-p/120234#M1584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It appears that you have the Unit set to Percent, and the aggregations are set to auto, sum. I suspect that the system is looking at your percentages then adding them up to give you a value over 100% &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 19:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Dynatrace-SaaS-Why-is-failure-rate-higher-than-100/m-p/120234#M1584</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-04T19:14:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Dynatrace SaaS] Why is failure rate higher than 100%?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Dynatrace-SaaS-Why-is-failure-rate-higher-than-100/m-p/120235#M1585</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've tested with Failure rate as seen by caller, and it seems much more adequate:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/27794-1609840383111.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/27770-1609840481309.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sampling is not the best, there are few accesses, but values seem far better now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 09:55:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Dynatrace-SaaS-Why-is-failure-rate-higher-than-100/m-p/120235#M1585</guid>
      <dc:creator>jalecrim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T09:55:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

