<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Davis Anomaly Detector for &amp;quot;slow&amp;quot; metrics in Alerting</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Davis-Anomaly-Detector-for-quot-slow-quot-metrics/m-p/288023#M5945</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The old metric events had the same limitation as seems to have the davis anomaly detector:&lt;BR /&gt;I. have a "slow" metric/timeseries, where a metric data point is produced only every hour. In a normal Notebook/query I can easily apply the Anomaly Detection (Auto) with whatever window or datapoints I want, and it works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However the Anomaly Detectors expect a metric resolution of 1 minute:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="r_weber_0-1760609261237.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/30584i1F5254A95C1AB106/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="r_weber_0-1760609261237.png" alt="r_weber_0-1760609261237.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMO for the anomlay detection it doesn't matter if the datapoints are far apart or not, it is just the amount of datapoints that is relevant, right? So for a "slow" metric I'd like to analyze a longer timeframe of 72h (=72 datapoints) and not just e.g 1h with - in a one minute requirement - 60 datapoints.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>r_weber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-16T10:10:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Davis Anomaly Detector for "slow" metrics</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Davis-Anomaly-Detector-for-quot-slow-quot-metrics/m-p/288023#M5945</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The old metric events had the same limitation as seems to have the davis anomaly detector:&lt;BR /&gt;I. have a "slow" metric/timeseries, where a metric data point is produced only every hour. In a normal Notebook/query I can easily apply the Anomaly Detection (Auto) with whatever window or datapoints I want, and it works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However the Anomaly Detectors expect a metric resolution of 1 minute:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="r_weber_0-1760609261237.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/30584i1F5254A95C1AB106/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="r_weber_0-1760609261237.png" alt="r_weber_0-1760609261237.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMO for the anomlay detection it doesn't matter if the datapoints are far apart or not, it is just the amount of datapoints that is relevant, right? So for a "slow" metric I'd like to analyze a longer timeframe of 72h (=72 datapoints) and not just e.g 1h with - in a one minute requirement - 60 datapoints.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Davis-Anomaly-Detector-for-quot-slow-quot-metrics/m-p/288023#M5945</guid>
      <dc:creator>r_weber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-16T10:10:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Davis Anomaly Detector for "slow" metrics</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Davis-Anomaly-Detector-for-quot-slow-quot-metrics/m-p/288438#M5962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/35901"&gt;@r_weber&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, that’s correct — this is indeed a &lt;STRONG&gt;limitation of the Davis Anomaly Detector&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just like with the old metric events, the detector currently expects &lt;STRONG&gt;a 1-minute metric resolution&lt;/STRONG&gt; and only analyzes data &lt;STRONG&gt;within the defined window size (up to 1 hour maximum)&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, for “slow” metrics with hourly data points, the Davis Anomaly Detector won’t perform well, as it doesn’t adapt its analysis window to the lower data frequency.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jean&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/Davis-Anomaly-Detector-for-quot-slow-quot-metrics/m-p/288438#M5962</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeanBlanc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-24T09:51:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

