<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: When are Davis Anomaly Detectors going to receive more granular permissions? in Alerting</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/When-are-Davis-Anomaly-Detectors-going-to-receive-more-granular/m-p/304971#M6480</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/87705"&gt;@ssipes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Based on the current documentation, access to Custom DQL Alerts is controlled through IAM permissions on the builtin:davis.anomaly-detectors settings schema. Users with settings:objects:write can create and modify anomaly detector configurations&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.dynatrace.com/docs/dynatrace-intelligence/anomaly-detection/set-up-anomaly-detectors-via-api" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Automate alerts with API — Dynatrace Docs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven't found any documentation or article where Dynatrace has publicly committed to a timeline for owner-based edit restrictions or security-context support for Anomaly Detectors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ownership and sharing model used by Pipelines appears to address the same use case, but I haven't found any public statement confirming that a similar approach is planned for Anomaly Detectors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, if anyone from Dynatrace can confirm whether ownership-based access control or security-context support is planned for Anomaly Detectors, that would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Sujit&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 19:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sujit_k_singh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-10-01T19:37:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>When are Davis Anomaly Detectors going to receive more granular permissions?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/When-are-Davis-Anomaly-Detectors-going-to-receive-more-granular/m-p/304964#M6479</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With metric events we were able to restrict access through management zones.&lt;BR /&gt;A user could only edit or create metric events within the management zones they had access to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently access to Davis Anomaly Detector (Custom DQL Alerts) are given through assigning the following IAM permissions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ALLOW settings:objects:write WHERE settings:schemaId = 'builtin:davis.anomaly-detectors';&lt;BR /&gt;ALLOW settings:objects:read WHERE settings:schemaId = 'builtin:davis.anomaly-detectors';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This lets users create Custom DQL Alerts, but it also lets them save and overwrite existing configs that were made by other people.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"settings:objects" does support the condition of: "settings:dt.security_context"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which I would try to use for access control.&lt;BR /&gt;Except Custom DQL Alerts do not have a place to assign a security context value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This leaves me with no option to enable this feature for my users without giving them broad access to edit another persons Custom DQL Alert.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can also see that Custom DQL Alerts have an "Owner" field.&lt;BR /&gt;Are there plans to make Custom DQL Alerts function similar to Pipelines?&lt;BR /&gt;Where there is a specific owner of the config that can share access to other people or groups?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ssipes_0-1790874088846.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34366i439E193BF7567A84/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" alt="ssipes_0-1790874088846.png" title="ssipes_0-1790874088846.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure if I'm just missing something here. If I am please correct me!&lt;BR /&gt;This is just a very cool feature that I'd love to give my users access to.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 17:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/When-are-Davis-Anomaly-Detectors-going-to-receive-more-granular/m-p/304964#M6479</guid>
      <dc:creator>ssipes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-01T17:02:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: When are Davis Anomaly Detectors going to receive more granular permissions?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/When-are-Davis-Anomaly-Detectors-going-to-receive-more-granular/m-p/304971#M6480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/87705"&gt;@ssipes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Based on the current documentation, access to Custom DQL Alerts is controlled through IAM permissions on the builtin:davis.anomaly-detectors settings schema. Users with settings:objects:write can create and modify anomaly detector configurations&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.dynatrace.com/docs/dynatrace-intelligence/anomaly-detection/set-up-anomaly-detectors-via-api" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Automate alerts with API — Dynatrace Docs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven't found any documentation or article where Dynatrace has publicly committed to a timeline for owner-based edit restrictions or security-context support for Anomaly Detectors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ownership and sharing model used by Pipelines appears to address the same use case, but I haven't found any public statement confirming that a similar approach is planned for Anomaly Detectors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, if anyone from Dynatrace can confirm whether ownership-based access control or security-context support is planned for Anomaly Detectors, that would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Sujit&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 19:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Alerting/When-are-Davis-Anomaly-Detectors-going-to-receive-more-granular/m-p/304971#M6480</guid>
      <dc:creator>sujit_k_singh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-01T19:37:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

