<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Enable Span Filtering and Saved Filters in Distributed Tracing Waterfall View in Dashboarding</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dashboarding/Enable-Span-Filtering-and-Saved-Filters-in-Distributed-Tracing/m-p/304953#M5901</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Problem&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;When analyzing distributed traces in Dynatrace, the waterfall view can become difficult to read because it displays all spans captured within a trace, including infrastructure and client transport calls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, traces often contain:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;HTTP client calls to metadata services&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Service-to-service transport spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SDK/framework-generated client spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;AI platform/API client calls such as *.aiplatform.googleapis.com&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;These spans are valuable for troubleshooting and should remain stored and searchable. However, during day-to-day root cause analysis they frequently add visual noise and make it harder to focus on the business transaction flow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Requested Enhancement&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;Add filtering capabilities directly within the Distributed Tracing waterfall view, allowing users to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H3&gt;Filter spans by&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Span kind (Client, Server, Internal, Producer, Consumer)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Span name&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Service name&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;URL or endpoint pattern&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Custom span attributes/tags&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H3&gt;Hide spans without deleting data&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;P&gt;Users should be able to temporarily hide matching spans from the waterfall visualization while preserving the underlying trace data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Examples:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide all Client spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide spans where URL contains ###.###.#######&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide spans where URL contains ###.###.###.###&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide transport or framework-generated spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create custom include/exclude rules&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H3&gt;Save Filter Preferences&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;P&gt;Allow users to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Save personal filter configurations&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reuse filters across trace investigations&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Set a default waterfall filter that is automatically applied when opening traces&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Expected Benefits&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Improved trace readability&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Faster root cause analysis&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reduced visual clutter in complex distributed traces&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Better user experience without sacrificing observability data&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No need to rely on external queries or separate span views for common filtering use cases&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Important Note&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;This request is &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; about dropping, sampling, or removing spans from ingestion. The goal is only to provide a visualization-layer filter in the waterfall view while retaining complete trace data for later investigation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:33:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AneesVP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-10-01T14:33:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Enable Span Filtering and Saved Filters in Distributed Tracing Waterfall View</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dashboarding/Enable-Span-Filtering-and-Saved-Filters-in-Distributed-Tracing/m-p/304953#M5901</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Problem&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;When analyzing distributed traces in Dynatrace, the waterfall view can become difficult to read because it displays all spans captured within a trace, including infrastructure and client transport calls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, traces often contain:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;HTTP client calls to metadata services&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Service-to-service transport spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SDK/framework-generated client spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;AI platform/API client calls such as *.aiplatform.googleapis.com&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;These spans are valuable for troubleshooting and should remain stored and searchable. However, during day-to-day root cause analysis they frequently add visual noise and make it harder to focus on the business transaction flow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Requested Enhancement&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;Add filtering capabilities directly within the Distributed Tracing waterfall view, allowing users to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H3&gt;Filter spans by&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Span kind (Client, Server, Internal, Producer, Consumer)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Span name&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Service name&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;URL or endpoint pattern&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Custom span attributes/tags&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H3&gt;Hide spans without deleting data&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;P&gt;Users should be able to temporarily hide matching spans from the waterfall visualization while preserving the underlying trace data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Examples:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide all Client spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide spans where URL contains ###.###.#######&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide spans where URL contains ###.###.###.###&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hide transport or framework-generated spans&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create custom include/exclude rules&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H3&gt;Save Filter Preferences&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;P&gt;Allow users to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Save personal filter configurations&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reuse filters across trace investigations&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Set a default waterfall filter that is automatically applied when opening traces&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Expected Benefits&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Improved trace readability&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Faster root cause analysis&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Reduced visual clutter in complex distributed traces&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Better user experience without sacrificing observability data&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No need to rely on external queries or separate span views for common filtering use cases&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Important Note&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;P&gt;This request is &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; about dropping, sampling, or removing spans from ingestion. The goal is only to provide a visualization-layer filter in the waterfall view while retaining complete trace data for later investigation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:33:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dashboarding/Enable-Span-Filtering-and-Saved-Filters-in-Distributed-Tracing/m-p/304953#M5901</guid>
      <dc:creator>AneesVP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-01T14:33:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

