<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Understanding Data Architecture in Dynatrace Managed: How is indexing handled? in Dynatrace Managed Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/Understanding-Data-Architecture-in-Dynatrace-Managed-How-is/m-p/300477#M4792</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to share an update on this since I opened a technical ticket with the Dynatrace Support team to get a definitive answer for our &lt;STRONG&gt;Managed&lt;/STRONG&gt; environment. Here is the architectural breakdown they provided regarding how data indexing and historical queries are handled under the hood:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Zero Manual Overhead:&lt;/STRONG&gt; In Dynatrace Managed, all data structures and indexes are fully predefined and optimized by the platform out-of-the-box. There is &lt;STRONG&gt;no manual schema or index management&lt;/STRONG&gt; required from the user/admin side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Two-Tier Querying Mechanism:&lt;/STRONG&gt; To keep performance fast without the typical storage bloom or heavy indexing overhead of traditional tools, Dynatrace uses a smart scoping strategy. For any historical query, the engine first leverages indexed &lt;STRONG&gt;low-cardinality dimensions&lt;/STRONG&gt; (like Service or Application) to instantly narrow down and scope the dataset.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;High-Cardinality Flexibility:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Once the dataset is scoped, it performs deeper scans on the &lt;STRONG&gt;high-cardinality data&lt;/STRONG&gt; (such as RUM sessions, traces, or logs). While unscoped high-cardinality queries can relatively be slower, this architecture architecture gives full flexibility to explore "unknowns" and perform deep analytical troubleshooting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Data Lifecycle:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Data is continuously aggregated over time and retained based on the configured retention periods to maintain optimal storage and cluster performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Grail Roadmap:&lt;/STRONG&gt; As of now, there is no official GTM (Go-To-Market) announcement regarding bringing the Grail architecture to the Managed/Private Cloud platform.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thought of sharing this here so anyone running Dynatrace Managed can benefit from this architectural clarity&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":victory_hand:"&gt;✌️&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Aboud1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-09T09:44:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Data Architecture in Dynatrace Managed: How is indexing handled?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/Understanding-Data-Architecture-in-Dynatrace-Managed-How-is/m-p/300266#M4787</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a quick architectural question regarding &lt;STRONG&gt;Dynatrace Managed&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know that Dynatrace SaaS leverages &lt;STRONG&gt;Grail&lt;/STRONG&gt; for a schema-less/index-less architecture. However, since Dynatrace Managed traditionally runs on &lt;STRONG&gt;Elasticsearch and Cassandra&lt;/STRONG&gt;, I want to better understand how data handling works under the hood here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How does Dynatrace Managed achieve high-speed, flexible queries on historical data (like Traces and RUM) without the typical heavy indexing overhead and storage bloom seen in traditional index-based tools?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there any automated data optimization patterns or "schema-on-read" behaviors happening even within the Elastic/Cassandra layer?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just trying to deeply understand the underlying philosophy for our Managed deployment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your insights.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Aboud&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 06:29:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/Understanding-Data-Architecture-in-Dynatrace-Managed-How-is/m-p/300266#M4787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aboud1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-08T06:29:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Understanding Data Architecture in Dynatrace Managed: How is indexing handled?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/Understanding-Data-Architecture-in-Dynatrace-Managed-How-is/m-p/300477#M4792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to share an update on this since I opened a technical ticket with the Dynatrace Support team to get a definitive answer for our &lt;STRONG&gt;Managed&lt;/STRONG&gt; environment. Here is the architectural breakdown they provided regarding how data indexing and historical queries are handled under the hood:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Zero Manual Overhead:&lt;/STRONG&gt; In Dynatrace Managed, all data structures and indexes are fully predefined and optimized by the platform out-of-the-box. There is &lt;STRONG&gt;no manual schema or index management&lt;/STRONG&gt; required from the user/admin side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Two-Tier Querying Mechanism:&lt;/STRONG&gt; To keep performance fast without the typical storage bloom or heavy indexing overhead of traditional tools, Dynatrace uses a smart scoping strategy. For any historical query, the engine first leverages indexed &lt;STRONG&gt;low-cardinality dimensions&lt;/STRONG&gt; (like Service or Application) to instantly narrow down and scope the dataset.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;High-Cardinality Flexibility:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Once the dataset is scoped, it performs deeper scans on the &lt;STRONG&gt;high-cardinality data&lt;/STRONG&gt; (such as RUM sessions, traces, or logs). While unscoped high-cardinality queries can relatively be slower, this architecture architecture gives full flexibility to explore "unknowns" and perform deep analytical troubleshooting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Data Lifecycle:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Data is continuously aggregated over time and retained based on the configured retention periods to maintain optimal storage and cluster performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Grail Roadmap:&lt;/STRONG&gt; As of now, there is no official GTM (Go-To-Market) announcement regarding bringing the Grail architecture to the Managed/Private Cloud platform.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thought of sharing this here so anyone running Dynatrace Managed can benefit from this architectural clarity&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":victory_hand:"&gt;✌️&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 09:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/Understanding-Data-Architecture-in-Dynatrace-Managed-How-is/m-p/300477#M4792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aboud1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-09T09:44:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

