<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: High traffic load agent update in Dynatrace Managed Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123648#M760</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with you, good point for RFE. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skrystosik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-27T11:13:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High traffic load during OneAgent update</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123645#M757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have noticed that every OneAgent update will retrieve his own software from the (Managed) cluster. Why can the environment ActiveGate not be used as a collector? This will save a lot of network bandwith.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;KR Henk&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123645#M757</guid>
      <dc:creator>henk_stobbe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-13T08:56:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High traffic load agent update</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123646#M758</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If gents does not have access to cluster, downloading agent is made through ActiveGate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:38:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123646#M758</guid>
      <dc:creator>skrystosik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T10:38:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High traffic load agent update</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123647#M759</link>
      <description>Still - something like optional "agent binaries cache" should be introduced to AG. If you have several hundrets of hosts, downloading 150MB of agent update directly to each one can be noticeable.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:53:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123647#M759</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T10:53:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High traffic load agent update</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123648#M760</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with you, good point for RFE. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Managed-Q-A/High-traffic-load-during-OneAgent-update/m-p/123648#M760</guid>
      <dc:creator>skrystosik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T11:13:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

