<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best practices for name taging / requestAtributte in Open Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Best-practices-for-name-taging-requestAtributte/m-p/117318#M11201</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our client we plan to have a large amount of requestAtributte and tags. We have thought that this may be a problem when this grows to be able to identify them quickly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone faced a similar situation? How have you dealt with it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I mean if there is a BestPractice for this, and to have more control with the names of these elements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for yours ideas.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bests regards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jose A&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jose-antonio_ra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-17T09:36:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best practices for name taging / requestAtributte</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Best-practices-for-name-taging-requestAtributte/m-p/117318#M11201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In our client we plan to have a large amount of requestAtributte and tags. We have thought that this may be a problem when this grows to be able to identify them quickly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone faced a similar situation? How have you dealt with it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I mean if there is a BestPractice for this, and to have more control with the names of these elements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for yours ideas.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bests regards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jose A&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Best-practices-for-name-taging-requestAtributte/m-p/117318#M11201</guid>
      <dc:creator>jose-antonio_ra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-17T09:36:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practices for name taging / requestAtributte</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Best-practices-for-name-taging-requestAtributte/m-p/117319#M11202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I mostly try to use general names for general request attributes, such as SOAP action and they are mostly used across the whole environment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For application specific request attributes, I always recommend to prefix it with short application name (idealy up to 3 characters), such as "XYZ RequestAttributeName" for the app XYZ.. For such attributes I try to limit the request attribute scope only on the application itself by defining the process groups.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't think there is is much more you can do at the moment. Renaming of request attributes is always easy, as the name can be changed after the definition.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:14:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Best-practices-for-name-taging-requestAtributte/m-p/117319#M11202</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-30T19:14:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

