<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Enhanced disk monitoring - DOUBLE criteria in Open Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/167957#M17509</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want to propose adding a second criteria for alerting based on full disks in Dynatrace.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could see this as an excellent option to add for both global configuration and at the host level.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now the only criteria for anolomy detection is based on percentage, but it would be very beneficial&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;to add a MB available threshold as well, please see example below:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;100 GB disk&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 1: 5 %&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 2: Below 500 GB available space&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Monitor: DOUBLE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Result:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alert if disk is below 5 % available space AND 500 GB&lt;BR /&gt;Effectively alert when there is 5 GB left&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;20 TB disk:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 1: 5 %&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 2: Below 500 GB available space&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Monitor: DOUBLE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Result:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alert if disk is below 5 % available space AND 500 GB, which is a good threshold to handle larger disks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Effectively alert when there is 2,5 % available space, as 5 % of 20 TB is 1 TB - which a lot of free space.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jonhaugen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-28T09:28:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Enhanced disk monitoring - DOUBLE criteria</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/167957#M17509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want to propose adding a second criteria for alerting based on full disks in Dynatrace.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could see this as an excellent option to add for both global configuration and at the host level.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now the only criteria for anolomy detection is based on percentage, but it would be very beneficial&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;to add a MB available threshold as well, please see example below:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;100 GB disk&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 1: 5 %&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 2: Below 500 GB available space&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Monitor: DOUBLE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Result:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alert if disk is below 5 % available space AND 500 GB&lt;BR /&gt;Effectively alert when there is 5 GB left&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;20 TB disk:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 1: 5 %&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Threshold 2: Below 500 GB available space&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Monitor: DOUBLE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Result:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alert if disk is below 5 % available space AND 500 GB, which is a good threshold to handle larger disks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Effectively alert when there is 2,5 % available space, as 5 % of 20 TB is 1 TB - which a lot of free space.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/167957#M17509</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonhaugen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-28T09:28:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enhanced disk monitoring - DOUBLE criteria</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/167960#M17511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/41854"&gt;@jonhaugen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally Disk fill alerts could do a lot better than what is currently possible. Some time ago &lt;A href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-product-ideas/Better-Disk-Usage-Alerting/idi-p/152939" target="_self"&gt;I posted an idea&lt;/A&gt; to have some intelligent baselining and prediction of disk fill rates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I still believe this would be the more "Dynatrace AI Way" for alerting on disks. Searching the community I found there are quite some posts around this topic but product management has never replied to any of the suggestions nor have we seen improvements on it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe upvote and revive my Idea from above if this would also solve your needs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kr,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reinhard&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:48:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/167960#M17511</guid>
      <dc:creator>r_weber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T10:48:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enhanced disk monitoring - DOUBLE criteria</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/167982#M17517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/35901"&gt;@r_weber&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;that was a very interesting post, it would certainly in many areas!&lt;BR /&gt;I believe also having a static threshold based on mbytes available + percentage would fulfill our needs where baselining would fall a bit short. Given the nature of many databases, grooming jobs and logging. As well as some of the largest file servers for instance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/167982#M17517</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonhaugen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T14:36:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enhanced disk monitoring - DOUBLE criteria</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/168990#M17749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I came to suggest this very idea, glad to see someone else wants it too!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Enhanced-disk-monitoring-DOUBLE-criteria/m-p/168990#M17749</guid>
      <dc:creator>ssheldon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-09T14:54:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

