<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Making the Dynatrace platform more secure in Open Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Making-the-Dynatrace-platform-more-secure/m-p/248626#M32811</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are limitations for outgoing connections in the platform,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="henk_stobbe_0-1718776525891.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20623i58B87196D0A8AD73/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="henk_stobbe_0-1718776525891.png" alt="henk_stobbe_0-1718776525891.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But would it not be better to have a "limit inbound connections" for the API calls?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only CI/CD can update the config? Less worries about old Tokens etc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KR Henk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 05:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>henk_stobbe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-19T05:59:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Making the Dynatrace platform more secure</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Making-the-Dynatrace-platform-more-secure/m-p/248626#M32811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are limitations for outgoing connections in the platform,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="henk_stobbe_0-1718776525891.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20623i58B87196D0A8AD73/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="henk_stobbe_0-1718776525891.png" alt="henk_stobbe_0-1718776525891.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But would it not be better to have a "limit inbound connections" for the API calls?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only CI/CD can update the config? Less worries about old Tokens etc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KR Henk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 05:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Making-the-Dynatrace-platform-more-secure/m-p/248626#M32811</guid>
      <dc:creator>henk_stobbe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-19T05:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Making the Dynatrace platform more secure</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Making-the-Dynatrace-platform-more-secure/m-p/248815#M32837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11427"&gt;@henk_stobbe&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That sounds good. Perhaps you could add this as a new feature idea at&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Product-ideas/idb-p/DynatraceProductIdeas" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Product-ideas/idb-p/DynatraceProductIdeas&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To enhance security, I restrict the creation of tokens to certain areas, such as the security team, and ensure all tokens have an expiration date of one year.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 21:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Making-the-Dynatrace-platform-more-secure/m-p/248815#M32837</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoseRomero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-20T21:38:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

