<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Host naming rule: host name format to incl. process name in Open Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Host-naming-rule-host-name-format-to-incl-process-name/m-p/252772#M33360</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, there's nothing unique in the k8s metadata.&lt;BR /&gt;But, I've spoken to the client and they are looking into changing that - at least then I might be able to use the metadata, yes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 09:40:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andre_vdveen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-07T09:40:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Host naming rule: host name format to incl. process name</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Host-naming-rule-host-name-format-to-incl-process-name/m-p/252180#M33296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are a number of EKS hosts that shows up with very random names. Creating a host naming rule using the k8s &lt;EM&gt;node_group_name&lt;/EM&gt; removes the very random names, but the result is that all hosts now have the same name e.g., &lt;STRONG&gt;eks-node-other&lt;/STRONG&gt;, based on the &lt;EM&gt;node_group_name&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I could use e.g., the process name on each of the nodes and make that part of the host name, that would be helpful. as it would split the 16 hosts into at least four different names - some of the hosts run the same process (workload) and it's OK for them to have the same name.&lt;BR /&gt;However, I don't see an option to use process name or something else that is not host related, for the naming rule.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm hoping someone has some clever ideas on what I could try to make the host names more unique?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 11:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Host-naming-rule-host-name-format-to-incl-process-name/m-p/252180#M33296</guid>
      <dc:creator>andre_vdveen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-01T11:19:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host naming rule: host name format to incl. process name</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Host-naming-rule-host-name-format-to-incl-process-name/m-p/252210#M33301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any chance of using k8s metadata to construct the name?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 07:23:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Host-naming-rule-host-name-format-to-incl-process-name/m-p/252210#M33301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-01T07:23:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Host naming rule: host name format to incl. process name</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Host-naming-rule-host-name-format-to-incl-process-name/m-p/252772#M33360</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, there's nothing unique in the k8s metadata.&lt;BR /&gt;But, I've spoken to the client and they are looking into changing that - at least then I might be able to use the metadata, yes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 09:40:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Host-naming-rule-host-name-format-to-incl-process-name/m-p/252772#M33360</guid>
      <dc:creator>andre_vdveen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-07T09:40:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

