<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Security Gateway Daisy Chaining in Open Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28123#M691</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Nick,  There's no additional compression benefits from running serialized SGs.    &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe_Hoffman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-13T15:20:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ActiveGate Daisy Chaining</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28120#M688</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I expect that the answer is no, but is it possible to have 2 Security Gateways 'daisy chained' together?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;OneAgent --&amp;gt; Private ActiveGate --&amp;gt; Private ActiveGate --&amp;gt; SaaS Dynatrace Cluster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know we have an embedded AG built into the Dynatrace Cluster. Is this bypassed when we have a Private AG?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Nick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 12:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28120#M688</guid>
      <dc:creator>nick_r_ross</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-02T12:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Gateway Daisy Chaining</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28121#M689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nick, I'd rather ask the question as to what drives you to want daisy chained SGs.   Perhaps a proxy server (not provided by Dynatrace) might address your real need?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 21:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28121#M689</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joe_Hoffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-12T21:46:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Gateway Daisy Chaining</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28122#M690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's a good point Joseph - I was wondering whether there would be any benefits in terms of further compression. A proxy would be a good option - thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28122#M690</guid>
      <dc:creator>nick_r_ross</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-13T07:35:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security Gateway Daisy Chaining</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28123#M691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nick,  There's no additional compression benefits from running serialized SGs.    &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/ActiveGate-Daisy-Chaining/m-p/28123#M691</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joe_Hoffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-13T15:20:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

