<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Any workaround/way to capture or configure request attribute based on body instead of header? in Open Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Any-workaround-way-to-capture-or-configure-request-attribute/m-p/110801#M7376</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s not possible. Even if it would be problem is that content of request attributes is limited to couple hounded of chars. Even if body is Jason payload it may be to little. It may produce overhead as well. This is why we don’t have such option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 06:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skrystosik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-29T06:25:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Any workaround/way to capture or configure request attribute based on body instead of header?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Any-workaround-way-to-capture-or-configure-request-attribute/m-p/110800#M7375</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Anyway to make dynatrace able to capture the content of body? just need it temporarily.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any insight.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wai Keat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 04:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Any-workaround-way-to-capture-or-configure-request-attribute/m-p/110800#M7375</guid>
      <dc:creator>waikeat_chan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-29T04:36:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Any workaround/way to capture or configure request attribute based on body instead of header?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Any-workaround-way-to-capture-or-configure-request-attribute/m-p/110801#M7376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s not possible. Even if it would be problem is that content of request attributes is limited to couple hounded of chars. Even if body is Jason payload it may be to little. It may produce overhead as well. This is why we don’t have such option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 06:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Any-workaround-way-to-capture-or-configure-request-attribute/m-p/110801#M7376</guid>
      <dc:creator>skrystosik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-29T06:25:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Any workaround/way to capture or configure request attribute based on body instead of header?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Any-workaround-way-to-capture-or-configure-request-attribute/m-p/110802#M7377</link>
      <description>The only way is to define the request attribute based on method parameters (Java/NET/PHP). It requires the knowledge of your code and it's not guaranteed you will find the right method as it depends on the application code structure.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/Any-workaround-way-to-capture-or-configure-request-attribute/m-p/110802#M7377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-29T14:57:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

