<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How can we explain gap in PP execution in Open Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/How-can-we-explain-gap-in-PP-execution/m-p/114464#M9515</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Purepaths does not show whole stack trace. Methods that are not important from this point of view are not instrumented. This is why dynatrace is able to catch 100% of traffic without visible overhead. In such case it is possible that statement was prepared or some generic code responsible for execution of statement was called and this is the reason.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian &lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skrystosik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-24T20:03:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How can we explain gap in PP execution</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/How-can-we-explain-gap-in-PP-execution/m-p/114463#M9514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prospect asks why there is a 14ms gap between the 2 executes query as the self time of the first one is only 357 nanosec and there is no other method seen on PP till the next execution?  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/19853-gap-in-execution.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yos &lt;A rel="user" href="https://answers.dynatrace.com/users/4393/view.html" nodeid="4393"&gt;@Gil Givati&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/How-can-we-explain-gap-in-PP-execution/m-p/114463#M9514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yosi_Neuman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-24T19:54:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we explain gap in PP execution</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/How-can-we-explain-gap-in-PP-execution/m-p/114464#M9515</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Purepaths does not show whole stack trace. Methods that are not important from this point of view are not instrumented. This is why dynatrace is able to catch 100% of traffic without visible overhead. In such case it is possible that statement was prepared or some generic code responsible for execution of statement was called and this is the reason.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian &lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 20:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/How-can-we-explain-gap-in-PP-execution/m-p/114464#M9515</guid>
      <dc:creator>skrystosik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-24T20:03:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How can we explain gap in PP execution</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/How-can-we-explain-gap-in-PP-execution/m-p/114465#M9516</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sebastian,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your explanation on this issue of PP!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Open-Q-A/How-can-we-explain-gap-in-PP-execution/m-p/114465#M9516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yosi_Neuman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-27T05:01:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

