<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices in Extensions</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/232264#M3817</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok. I've just opened a case. It failed even though I put in a bucket of 500 devices.. I'll let you know if I get any news. Maybe a soft limit in our tenant.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jegron</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-18T16:23:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/217901#M3234</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a v2 extension, SNMP, that has around 1500 devices. Initially, most of them were created in blocks with 100 devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configurations are dynamic though, and being API driven. So I'm getting "fragmented" monitoring configurations. And I'm creating new ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if using blocks with 100 devices turns out to be more efficient or not. But given what is said in &lt;A href="https://www.dynatrace.com/support/help/extend-dynatrace/extensions20/extensions-concepts" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.dynatrace.com/support/help/extend-dynatrace/extensions20/extensions-concepts&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;You can define up to 20,000 devices for a single monitoring configuration. Configurations are split into buckets, with a default size of 100 devices per bucket. Each bucket of devices is polled independently as a separate process on one of the ActiveGates in a group. This feature is automatically enabled for WMI, Prometheus, SNMP, and SQL extensions, while for other types of extensions, its activation depends on the specific extension.&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;it seems that Dynatrace gets my fragmented configurations, and runs them in buckets of 100 devices, and I need not worry?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW, when we scale usage of SNMP monitoring, what other efficiency measures are appropriate?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:04:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/217901#M3234</guid>
      <dc:creator>AntonioSousa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-13T11:04:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/217982#M3236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You indeed do not need to worry anymore. Dynatrace automatically splitting up a large monitoring configuration into smaller ones and distributing them onto the AGs makes for a much easier set up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Efficiency measures - Making sure that the AG is close to the device so it's not having a lot of network latency and dropped packages. The SNMP datasource scales quite well both horizontally and vertically, giving you many options on how to get more devices monitored.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/217982#M3236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike_L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-13T16:40:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/217984#M3237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11520"&gt;@Mike_L&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your input! I really feel that we are able to monitor large setups with relatively few AG resources. We do have to open some gates, but I believe they are there to protect against bad setups.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/217984#M3237</guid>
      <dc:creator>AntonioSousa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-13T16:57:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229512#M3643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;I am testing SNMP for Generic Network devices as well.&lt;BR /&gt;Using 1 Active Gate at the moment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i add 1600 devices, SNMP polling seems just to stop working. I waited longer than 1 hour, but the logs kept empty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After dropping to 200 devices only i get this alert:&lt;BR /&gt;Failed to assign monitoring configuration to ActiveGate. Reason: INVALID_CONFIG_ERROR:Invalid configuration: Activation configuration contains too many SNMP devices: 155; [status code=32];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems the limit is 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failed to assign monitoring configuration to ActiveGate. Reason: INVALID_CONFIG_ERROR:Invalid configuration: Activation configuration contains too many SNMP devices: 102; [status code=32];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;below 100 devices it works&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229512#M3643</guid>
      <dc:creator>mferstl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T13:27:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229536#M3646</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/38390"&gt;@mferstl&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, there is a limit of 100 per monitoring configuration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="AntonioSousa_0-1700578145904.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/15738i9927C91D85B7980C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="AntonioSousa_0-1700578145904.png" alt="AntonioSousa_0-1700578145904.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.dynatrace.com/docs/extend-dynatrace/extensions20/extensions-concepts" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.dynatrace.com/docs/extend-dynatrace/extensions20/extensions-concepts&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:49:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229536#M3646</guid>
      <dc:creator>AntonioSousa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T14:49:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229545#M3647</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;SNMP extensions are remote, and fall under the next row in that table. The limit is 20.000. I'd go with a support ticket if it's failing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229545#M3647</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike_L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T15:23:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229562#M3649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11520"&gt;@Mike_L&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I too have the 100 limit happened in a customer, some 4 weeks ago. Message was the same: "&lt;SPAN&gt;Failed to assign monitoring configuration to ActiveGate. Reason: INVALID_CONFIG_ERROR:Invalid configuration: Activation configuration contains too many SNMP devices:&lt;/SPAN&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229562#M3649</guid>
      <dc:creator>AntonioSousa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T16:18:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229567#M3650</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The monitoring configuration should automatically split up the endpoints into batches of 100 and spread them over the AG group. Please go with a support case if you see this again as it’s not working as designed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/229567#M3650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike_L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T17:20:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/232247#M3814</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17213"&gt;@AntonioSousa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the same issue :&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Failed to assign monitoring configuration to ActiveGate. Reason: INVALID_CONFIG_ERROR:Invalid configuration: Activation configuration contains too many SNMP devices: &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;336&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you find a solution ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/232247#M3814</guid>
      <dc:creator>jegron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T14:16:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/232261#M3816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/47129"&gt;@jegron&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment, we separate monitoring configurations in blocks of one hundred. But as &lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11520"&gt;@Mike_L&lt;/a&gt; has said, it shouldn't occur. I'll have to test it again, last time I had more than 100, it failed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/232261#M3816</guid>
      <dc:creator>AntonioSousa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T16:11:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/232264#M3817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok. I've just opened a case. It failed even though I put in a bucket of 500 devices.. I'll let you know if I get any news. Maybe a soft limit in our tenant.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/232264#M3817</guid>
      <dc:creator>jegron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T16:23:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Efficiency with many SNMP devices</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/234417#M3932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17213"&gt;@AntonioSousa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your information there is an issue with the bucket feature. It works if you set 100 in the bucket size. But if you let the field empty or set a value other than 100 it does not work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Support told me that the patch would be available in ActiveGate version 1.283.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/Efficiency-with-many-SNMP-devices/m-p/234417#M3932</guid>
      <dc:creator>jegron</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-16T08:58:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

