topic Re: VIP for SNMP Trap in Extensions

VIP for SNMP Trap

gchastne — Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:22:21 GMT

Has anyone successfully configured a VIP in front of a pair of ActiveGate for resilient SNMP Trap ingestion?

Re: VIP for SNMP Trap

AntonioSousa — Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:43:49 GMT

@gchastne,

Not sure what your idea is, but some notes from my side:

If you have a VIP and the SNMP "load balancer" is able to send it to one of the AGs behind it, there should be no issue
If you send it to more than one AG , you will get repeated traps/logs in Dynatrace
SNMP traps are UDP based, so there is no good way for a "load balancer" to detect if traps are being received or not
There was an issue sometime ago where IPs with no reverse lookup would block some SNMP traps being received. Not sure if it has been resolved. Please make sure they are resolvable; in my case I had to put them in local AG host files...
A VIP for SNMP might be an interesting idea if you are forwarding traps to more than one platform, and don't want to change configurations on emitting devices...

Re: VIP for SNMP Trap

gautier_begin — Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:46:12 GMT

Graham,

I think this is possible using a NGINX in reverse proxy mode:

TCP and UDP Load Balancing | NGINX Documentation

Regards

Re: VIP for SNMP Trap

LaurentBignens — Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:31:43 GMT

Our network team was against adding a load balancer for that, so we implemented a VIP.
The VIP (virtual IP) switches over the pair of AGs (Active Gate) using the keepalived redhat service where our "SNMP Traps" extension is running to ingest these traps.
N.B. as a side effect, the AG has a new address assigned to it, and it took the name of that new VIP.