<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PingOne Extension - Suggessions in Extensions</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/PingOne-Extension-Suggessions/m-p/301003#M7308</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a use case of ingesting PingOne logs and created workflow and ingesting via direct API call to PingOne. Ingesion is going good but to avoid duplicates, scanning the logs for dups which is causing additional cost for scanning. We thought of PingOne Extension may solve the issue but seems extension will not handle. Looking for suggessions on this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>observefdfx</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-19T15:03:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PingOne Extension - Suggessions</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/PingOne-Extension-Suggessions/m-p/301003#M7308</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a use case of ingesting PingOne logs and created workflow and ingesting via direct API call to PingOne. Ingesion is going good but to avoid duplicates, scanning the logs for dups which is causing additional cost for scanning. We thought of PingOne Extension may solve the issue but seems extension will not handle. Looking for suggessions on this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Extensions/PingOne-Extension-Suggessions/m-p/301003#M7308</guid>
      <dc:creator>observefdfx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-19T15:03:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

