<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic APDEX formula question - why 4T for frustrated? in Real User Monitoring</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112543#M1053</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In relation to previously discussed&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.dynatrace.com/spaces/482/dynatrace-open-qa/questions/216111/fine-tuning-app-apdex-settungs.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://community.dynatrace.com/spaces/482/dynatrace...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can one explain me the reason for 4 multiplier?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it reasonable good assumption or result of hard scientific research?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/19563-overview-figure1-performancezones-256-111.gif" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have spent some time reading &lt;A href="http://apdex.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;apdex.org&lt;/A&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;ApdexTechnicalSpecificationV11_000.pdf &lt;/STRONG&gt;and did not find the answer. It just recommended and came out of blue. Strange.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks to every opinion!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards, Igor&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:49:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>imoskovko1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-16T14:49:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>APDEX formula question - why 4T for frustrated?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112543#M1053</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In relation to previously discussed&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.dynatrace.com/spaces/482/dynatrace-open-qa/questions/216111/fine-tuning-app-apdex-settungs.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://community.dynatrace.com/spaces/482/dynatrace...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can one explain me the reason for 4 multiplier?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it reasonable good assumption or result of hard scientific research?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/19563-overview-figure1-performancezones-256-111.gif" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have spent some time reading &lt;A href="http://apdex.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;apdex.org&lt;/A&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;ApdexTechnicalSpecificationV11_000.pdf &lt;/STRONG&gt;and did not find the answer. It just recommended and came out of blue. Strange.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks to every opinion!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards, Igor&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:49:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112543#M1053</guid>
      <dc:creator>imoskovko1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-16T14:49:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: APDEX formula question - why 4T for frustrated?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112544#M1054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dynatrace has just followed the "de-facto" standard of Apdex.org. We want to improve this in future in two ways: At first we plan to implement more custom configuration to modify the apdex calculation. Second step is to make more research on a better default setting as the definition of Apdex is very old and as you have mentioned without any real statistical approach. But for both items, we don't have any date at this point in time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 18:00:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112544#M1054</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexanderSommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-01T18:00:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: APDEX formula question - why 4T for frustrated?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112545#M1055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Alexander! It answers my question. I will know that it is de-facto standard or best practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Igor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2019 11:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112545#M1055</guid>
      <dc:creator>imoskovko1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-03T11:08:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: APDEX formula question - why 4T for frustrated?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112546#M1056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;By the way, here is enhansement request submitted regarding fine tuning APDEX thresholds:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.dynatrace.com/spaces/483/dynatrace-product-ideas/idea/216204/saas-managed-fine-tune-applicatiin-apdex-threshold.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.dynatrace.com/spaces/483/dynatrace-product-ideas/idea/216204/saas-managed-fine-tune-applicatiin-apdex-threshold.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:49:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/APDEX-formula-question-why-4T-for-frustrated/m-p/112546#M1056</guid>
      <dc:creator>imoskovko1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-16T14:49:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

