<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Provider breakdown and resource type in Real User Monitoring</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121870#M2195</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You are correct, there is not a recommendation of 1st or 3rd party for mobile RUM. Either way works, whichever is better for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bobby_crumley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-17T18:30:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Provider breakdown and resource type</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121866#M2191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To have mobile RUM data (Mobile RUM (external) we use an SSL certificate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By default resource type detects as &lt;STRONG&gt;3&lt;SUP&gt;rd&lt;/SUP&gt; party&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Should we leave it as it is or should we change to the &lt;STRONG&gt;1&lt;SUP&gt;st&lt;/SUP&gt; party&lt;/STRONG&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Babar&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 05:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121866#M2191</guid>
      <dc:creator>Babar_Qayyum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-17T05:51:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider breakdown and resource type</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121867#M2192</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey &lt;A rel="user" href="https://answers.dynatrace.com/users/5357/view.html" nodeid="5357"&gt;@Babar Q.&lt;/A&gt; When we were a managed customer we also changed from 3rd party to first party as well. Its really up to you. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121867#M2192</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-17T16:12:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider breakdown and resource type</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121868#M2193</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;A rel="user" href="https://answers.dynatrace.com/users/36422/view.html" nodeid="36422"&gt;@Chad T.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your comments and for sharing your personal experience. It means there are no recommendations and also there are no pros and cons to this configuration/modification. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;CORRECT&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Babar&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:33:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121868#M2193</guid>
      <dc:creator>Babar_Qayyum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-17T17:33:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider breakdown and resource type</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121869#M2194</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;﻿The main benefit is indeed being able to identify what resources are 1st and 3rd party accurately when you're looking at performance in the Dynatrace product.&lt;BR /&gt;﻿&lt;BR /&gt;﻿Another good example is in our Dashboarding capabilities we can get a better view of traffic regarding the different sources &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/28284-1613586445011.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There isn't a difference in granularity or information but it's a better way to organize and understand how your resources are affected and where they're coming from. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One additional piece I wanted to add was the ability to count resources used in a user action via USQL.&lt;BR /&gt;﻿Take this example: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/28268-1613586511126.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we go to a specific User Action and analyze it as well we can get more info on the Resources and their effect on action duration &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.dynatrace.com/legacyfs/online/28277-1613586541058.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So back to the purpose of classifying/organizing them - it's just to make sure Dynatrace better reflects your environment and visualization of what's going on &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121869#M2194</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-17T18:29:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider breakdown and resource type</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121870#M2195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are correct, there is not a recommendation of 1st or 3rd party for mobile RUM. Either way works, whichever is better for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks - &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121870#M2195</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobby_crumley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-17T18:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider breakdown and resource type</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121871#M2196</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;A rel="user" href="https://answers.dynatrace.com/users/36422/view.html" nodeid="36422"&gt;@Chad T.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once again thank you for sharing your point of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Babar&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121871#M2196</guid>
      <dc:creator>Babar_Qayyum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-18T05:39:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Provider breakdown and resource type</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121872#M2197</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;A rel="user" href="https://answers.dynatrace.com/users/3521/view.html" nodeid="3521"&gt;@Bob C.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Babar&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 05:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Provider-breakdown-and-resource-type/m-p/121872#M2197</guid>
      <dc:creator>Babar_Qayyum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-18T05:40:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

