<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Preventing dynatrace from adding a x-dynatrace header in Real User Monitoring</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230734#M5503</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/46798"&gt;@Parkash_jha&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is the situation when some axway policies are calculating checksum based on http headers and as they differ between incoming and outgoing requests? We had such a situation with one customer already.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 16:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-04T16:58:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Prevent Dynatrace from Injecting the x‑dynatrace Header</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/124562#M2340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Summary:&amp;nbsp;This post explains configuration options for preventing the x‑dynatrace header from being injected into requests. It describes OneAgent settings and scenarios where removal is required.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to prevent Dynatrace from adding the x-dynatrace header in specific (outgoing) requests? Or do I need to exclude the whole service from being monitored?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;KR Henk&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/124562#M2340</guid>
      <dc:creator>henk_stobbe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-27T10:48:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preventing dynatrace from adding a x-dynatrace header</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/124563#M2341</link>
      <description>At the moment can only disable monitoring at the process level (you cannot disable monitoring at service level).&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I remember this feature is planned or maybe in the pipeline already. What exactly is the issue? Headers starting with X- do not imply any action on the called party. Normally they must be ignored if the called service does not know them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/124563#M2341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-21T20:01:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preventing dynatrace from adding a x-dynatrace header</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230558#M5500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3364"&gt;@Julius_Loman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are also facing the same issue with our application where x-headers are not able to excluded due to which some of the api calls got impacted and therefore we were forced to disable the oneagent on the host.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you know if this&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;feature is already planned or implemented to exclude the x-dynatrace header at process or service level so that we can set the same.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--Parkash&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230558#M5500</guid>
      <dc:creator>Parkash_jha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-01T13:31:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preventing dynatrace from adding a x-dynatrace header</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230605#M5501</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, I don't think this is possible on your own, only by disabling oneagent features. What issue does the added header raise in your environment?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 16:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230605#M5501</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-01T16:54:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preventing dynatrace from adding a x-dynatrace header</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230722#M5502</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response on this &lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3364"&gt;@Julius_Loman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;. We have an AXWAY api gateway in between which is transforming the headers to sent the request to backend services and due to this x-dyantrace header - api transformation resulting into error due to this application got impacted. We have also raised a case&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;#253305 in order to check if some option can be done from the dynatrace end or RFE is needed to fix this issue as we cannot go with infra-only mode as we want to monitor the application as full stack.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Parkash&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 10:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230722#M5502</guid>
      <dc:creator>Parkash_jha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-04T10:35:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preventing dynatrace from adding a x-dynatrace header</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230734#M5503</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/46798"&gt;@Parkash_jha&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is the situation when some axway policies are calculating checksum based on http headers and as they differ between incoming and outgoing requests? We had such a situation with one customer already.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 16:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Real-User-Monitoring/Prevent-Dynatrace-from-Injecting-the-x-dynatrace-Header/m-p/230734#M5503</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julius_Loman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-04T16:58:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

