<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SLO template - Host CPU usage utilization in Automations</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/SLO-template-Host-CPU-usage-utilization/m-p/305389#M2749</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to understand the purpose and expected usage of the &lt;STRONG&gt;"Host CPU Usage Utilization"&lt;/STRONG&gt; SLO template.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When creating this SLO, the default target is set to &lt;STRONG&gt;98%&lt;/STRONG&gt;. However, CPU utilization for healthy hosts is typically well below this value. As a result, the SLO remains in a failed/red state, even when the host is operating normally.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Host CPU utilization is consistently around &lt;STRONG&gt;5-12%&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SLO target is &lt;STRONG&gt;98%&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SLO status remains red with significant error budget consumption&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My expectation for a CPU utilization SLO would be:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Good event:&lt;/STRONG&gt; CPU utilization remains below the saturation threshold (e.g., &amp;lt;85% or &amp;lt;98%)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Bad event:&lt;/STRONG&gt; CPU utilization exceeds the saturation threshold&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In other words, if a host's CPU utilization stays below 98% for the entire evaluation period, I would expect the SLO to be healthy (green), since the system is not saturated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, the current template appears to evaluate the raw utilization value against the target, which effectively means higher CPU utilization is considered better. This seems counterintuitive for a saturation-oriented metric.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could someone help clarify:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;What is the intended use case for the &lt;STRONG&gt;Host CPU Usage Utilization&lt;/STRONG&gt; SLO template?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Is the template designed to measure CPU utilization itself rather than compliance with a saturation threshold?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If the goal is to measure CPU saturation, would a custom DQL-based SLI be required to model "CPU utilization remains below X%" as the success condition?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Are there recommended best practices from Dynatrace for creating infrastructure/resource utilization SLOs?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I may be misunderstanding the intent of this template and would appreciate any guidance from the Dynatrace team or community members.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pradeepkadam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-10-19T06:30:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SLO template - Host CPU usage utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/SLO-template-Host-CPU-usage-utilization/m-p/305389#M2749</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to understand the purpose and expected usage of the &lt;STRONG&gt;"Host CPU Usage Utilization"&lt;/STRONG&gt; SLO template.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When creating this SLO, the default target is set to &lt;STRONG&gt;98%&lt;/STRONG&gt;. However, CPU utilization for healthy hosts is typically well below this value. As a result, the SLO remains in a failed/red state, even when the host is operating normally.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Host CPU utilization is consistently around &lt;STRONG&gt;5-12%&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SLO target is &lt;STRONG&gt;98%&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SLO status remains red with significant error budget consumption&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My expectation for a CPU utilization SLO would be:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Good event:&lt;/STRONG&gt; CPU utilization remains below the saturation threshold (e.g., &amp;lt;85% or &amp;lt;98%)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Bad event:&lt;/STRONG&gt; CPU utilization exceeds the saturation threshold&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In other words, if a host's CPU utilization stays below 98% for the entire evaluation period, I would expect the SLO to be healthy (green), since the system is not saturated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, the current template appears to evaluate the raw utilization value against the target, which effectively means higher CPU utilization is considered better. This seems counterintuitive for a saturation-oriented metric.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could someone help clarify:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;What is the intended use case for the &lt;STRONG&gt;Host CPU Usage Utilization&lt;/STRONG&gt; SLO template?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Is the template designed to measure CPU utilization itself rather than compliance with a saturation threshold?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If the goal is to measure CPU saturation, would a custom DQL-based SLI be required to model "CPU utilization remains below X%" as the success condition?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Are there recommended best practices from Dynatrace for creating infrastructure/resource utilization SLOs?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I may be misunderstanding the intent of this template and would appreciate any guidance from the Dynatrace team or community members.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/SLO-template-Host-CPU-usage-utilization/m-p/305389#M2749</guid>
      <dc:creator>pradeepkadam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-19T06:30:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

