https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/The-CI-name-is-being-inserted-into-company-field/m-p/111027#M981 <P>Hello,</P><P>When using the ServiceNOW - Dynatrace cmdb sychronisation it looks like the CI name is being inserted into company field.</P><P>In the <STRONG>x_dynat_ruxit_ci_mapping.xml</STRONG><BR /> I see that a reference core_company (table) is used.for this field</P><P> Is there any way to get the correct value or is this a bug?</P><P>KR Henk </P><BR /> Thu, 03 Jan 2019 10:18:24 GMT henk_stobbe 2019-01-03T10:18:24Z https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/The-CI-name-is-being-inserted-into-company-field/m-p/111027#M981 <P>Hello,</P><P>When using the ServiceNOW - Dynatrace cmdb sychronisation it looks like the CI name is being inserted into company field.</P><P>In the <STRONG>x_dynat_ruxit_ci_mapping.xml</STRONG><BR /> I see that a reference core_company (table) is used.for this field</P><P> Is there any way to get the correct value or is this a bug?</P><P>KR Henk </P><BR /> Thu, 03 Jan 2019 10:18:24 GMT https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/The-CI-name-is-being-inserted-into-company-field/m-p/111027#M981 henk_stobbe 2019-01-03T10:18:24Z https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/The-CI-name-is-being-inserted-into-company-field/m-p/111028#M982 <P>We have integrations with servicenow without such problems. Didn't anyone reconfigured ci mappings table inside your servicenow instance?</P><P>Sebastian </P><BR /> Thu, 03 Jan 2019 10:31:58 GMT https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Automations/The-CI-name-is-being-inserted-into-company-field/m-p/111028#M982 skrystosik 2019-01-03T10:31:58Z