<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AKS and Dynatrace Agent through  scaling set exctention in Container platforms</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178029#M326</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11427"&gt;@henk_stobbe&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;So Dynatrace also changed their methodology of the Oneagent and Operator Deployment. The current standard is to leverage an AG that is created via a POD on the node. Which is a good idea for small use cases and quick spin ups for Proof of concepts, but I'm not sold on it as an enterprise solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the older method you point the operator to communicate via a designated AG, so all the communication targets one AG, then goes into the Dynatrace UI, Thus only needing one firewall to be opened for that AG Communication.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But with the new standard, if Nodes/Clusters are going to have an AG Pod, then we need to list all those IPs for the networking team to allow the communication. Which I feel like is a step backwards, as a core fundamental of the AG is to bundle all the traffic and send it along.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I'm not sold on it, we will be stickling with the Oneagent Operator deployment with Dedicated AGs and Cluster APIs&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-23T14:44:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AKS and Dynatrace Agent through  scaling set exctention</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178011#M323</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a problem using the Azure OneAgent extention in the scaling set instead of the kubernetes operator?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words, installing a oneAgent on a kubernetes kluster host, why not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KR Henk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178011#M323</guid>
      <dc:creator>henk_stobbe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-23T13:19:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AKS and Dynatrace Agent through  scaling set exctention</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178012#M324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11427"&gt;@henk_stobbe&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;we only leverage the kubernetes Cluster connection via the API integration while the Oneagent gets deployed out to the Nodes/Pods/Containers. We would love to get more observability and functionality as we all have come to know and love with the Dynatrace Oneagent.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178012#M324</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-23T13:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AKS and Dynatrace Agent through  scaling set exctention</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178025#M325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Found another thread about the )-;:,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Open-Q-A/Kubernetes-Monitoring/m-p/175620#M18913" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Dynatrace-Open-Q-A/Kubernetes-Monitoring/m-p/175620#M18913&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In simple terms, its the Dynatrace way vs the kubernetes way (-; So no difference except when Host are scaled in or out,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KR Henk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178025#M325</guid>
      <dc:creator>henk_stobbe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-23T14:38:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AKS and Dynatrace Agent through  scaling set exctention</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178029#M326</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11427"&gt;@henk_stobbe&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;So Dynatrace also changed their methodology of the Oneagent and Operator Deployment. The current standard is to leverage an AG that is created via a POD on the node. Which is a good idea for small use cases and quick spin ups for Proof of concepts, but I'm not sold on it as an enterprise solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the older method you point the operator to communicate via a designated AG, so all the communication targets one AG, then goes into the Dynatrace UI, Thus only needing one firewall to be opened for that AG Communication.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But with the new standard, if Nodes/Clusters are going to have an AG Pod, then we need to list all those IPs for the networking team to allow the communication. Which I feel like is a step backwards, as a core fundamental of the AG is to bundle all the traffic and send it along.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I'm not sold on it, we will be stickling with the Oneagent Operator deployment with Dedicated AGs and Cluster APIs&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Container-platforms/AKS-and-Dynatrace-Agent-through-scaling-set-exctention/m-p/178029#M326</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-23T14:44:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

