<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lesser throughput seen on Dynatrace as compared to actual in Log Analytics</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Lesser-throughput-seen-on-Dynatrace-as-compared-to-actual/m-p/279817#M1369</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have recently on boarded Dynatrace as our Monitoring solution. But we have observed lesser throughput for our SpringBoot service as compared to our existing Grafana metrics. We have an average of about 500 rps on one of our services and we have multiple of such services. Is there any rate limits that gets applied by default which we should change to allow Dynatrace accept more requests?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>anayan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-23T09:01:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lesser throughput seen on Dynatrace as compared to actual</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Lesser-throughput-seen-on-Dynatrace-as-compared-to-actual/m-p/279817#M1369</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have recently on boarded Dynatrace as our Monitoring solution. But we have observed lesser throughput for our SpringBoot service as compared to our existing Grafana metrics. We have an average of about 500 rps on one of our services and we have multiple of such services. Is there any rate limits that gets applied by default which we should change to allow Dynatrace accept more requests?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Lesser-throughput-seen-on-Dynatrace-as-compared-to-actual/m-p/279817#M1369</guid>
      <dc:creator>anayan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-23T09:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lesser throughput seen on Dynatrace as compared to actual</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Lesser-throughput-seen-on-Dynatrace-as-compared-to-actual/m-p/279824#M1370</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I noticed you posted this question under the "Log Analytics" sub-forum..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you elaborate on what data type (metrics, traces, logs, or events) you are observing the discrepancy on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The answer to that question is important, as it will inform next steps to investigate the issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:53:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Lesser-throughput-seen-on-Dynatrace-as-compared-to-actual/m-p/279824#M1370</guid>
      <dc:creator>marco_irmer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-19T21:53:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lesser throughput seen on Dynatrace as compared to actual</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Lesser-throughput-seen-on-Dynatrace-as-compared-to-actual/m-p/279844#M1373</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Under the multidimensional analysis I am checking the Request Count metrics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="anayan_0-1750399791379.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28583iDF79FA08C6719AC1/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="anayan_0-1750399791379.png" alt="anayan_0-1750399791379.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 06:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Lesser-throughput-seen-on-Dynatrace-as-compared-to-actual/m-p/279844#M1373</guid>
      <dc:creator>anayan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-20T06:09:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

