<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ability to use annotatins/labels for kube security context in Log Analytics</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Ability-to-use-annotations-labels-for-Kubernetes-security/m-p/287079#M1469</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5224"&gt;@ronmacdonald&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;were you able to get a solution to this? did you end up putting in a RFE? If so can you share it here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-30T19:05:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ability to use annotations/labels for Kubernetes security context</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Ability-to-use-annotations-labels-for-Kubernetes-security/m-p/258720#M64</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It appears security context for log data only supports filters, not lookup or joins.&amp;nbsp; I need to apply security context for logs by annotations/labels on the process group producing the logs.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to accomplish this currently?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:45:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Ability-to-use-annotations-labels-for-Kubernetes-security/m-p/258720#M64</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronmacdonald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-17T13:45:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ability to use annotatins/labels for kube security context</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Ability-to-use-annotations-labels-for-Kubernetes-security/m-p/287079#M1469</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5224"&gt;@ronmacdonald&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;were you able to get a solution to this? did you end up putting in a RFE? If so can you share it here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Ability-to-use-annotations-labels-for-Kubernetes-security/m-p/287079#M1469</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-30T19:05:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ability to use annotatins/labels for kube security context</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Ability-to-use-annotations-labels-for-Kubernetes-security/m-p/287090#M1472</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a feature based based on supported OA, AG, and possibly the operator (we are cloud native).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The config is in the "cloud and virtualization &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Kubernetes telemetry enrichment"&lt;BR /&gt;We are using k8 labels to set security_context.&amp;nbsp; We are seeing the value miss for some expected log records and are in early stages of investigating.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 20:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Log-Analytics/Ability-to-use-annotations-labels-for-Kubernetes-security/m-p/287090#M1472</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronmacdonald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-30T20:04:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

