<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>article Why there is difference in Elasticsearch store usage between Managed cluster nodes? in Troubleshooting</title>
    <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Troubleshooting/Why-there-is-difference-in-Elasticsearch-store-usage-between/ta-p/200631</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-template-question-zone"&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Question&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can see that disk usage differs between the cluster nodes, and I want to know why it is not equally distributed.&lt;BR /&gt;For example,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Node1 (id=1) current disk space usage: 70%&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Node2 (id=2) current disk space usage: 60%&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Node3 (id=3) current disk space usage: 50%&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-template-answer-zone"&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Answer&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That is because the data is distributed based on the number of shards and not necessarily by the size of the data itself.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, in the multi-node cluster, we can see that the number of Shards distributed is ~61 across all the nodes, but the Used Disk value is different.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jonghpark_0-1671138731314.png" style="width: 539px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9039i5DDAFB896D7F3945/image-dimensions/539x299?v=v2" width="539" height="299" role="button" title="jonghpark_0-1671138731314.png" alt="jonghpark_0-1671138731314.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Apart from that Elasticsearch does not actively re-balance the data if the watermark thresholds set inside Elasticsearch are not "violated".&lt;BR /&gt;watermark.low = 85%,&amp;nbsp;watermark.high = 90%, and watermark.flood_stage = 95%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For more details, read:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/modules-cluster.html#modules-cluster" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/modules-cluster.html#modules-cluster&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 09:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jonghpark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-03T09:58:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why there is difference in Elasticsearch store usage between Managed cluster nodes?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Troubleshooting/Why-there-is-difference-in-Elasticsearch-store-usage-between/ta-p/200631</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-template-question-zone"&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Question&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can see that disk usage differs between the cluster nodes, and I want to know why it is not equally distributed.&lt;BR /&gt;For example,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Node1 (id=1) current disk space usage: 70%&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Node2 (id=2) current disk space usage: 60%&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Node3 (id=3) current disk space usage: 50%&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-template-answer-zone"&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Answer&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That is because the data is distributed based on the number of shards and not necessarily by the size of the data itself.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, in the multi-node cluster, we can see that the number of Shards distributed is ~61 across all the nodes, but the Used Disk value is different.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jonghpark_0-1671138731314.png" style="width: 539px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9039i5DDAFB896D7F3945/image-dimensions/539x299?v=v2" width="539" height="299" role="button" title="jonghpark_0-1671138731314.png" alt="jonghpark_0-1671138731314.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Apart from that Elasticsearch does not actively re-balance the data if the watermark thresholds set inside Elasticsearch are not "violated".&lt;BR /&gt;watermark.low = 85%,&amp;nbsp;watermark.high = 90%, and watermark.flood_stage = 95%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For more details, read:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/modules-cluster.html#modules-cluster" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/modules-cluster.html#modules-cluster&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 09:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Troubleshooting/Why-there-is-difference-in-Elasticsearch-store-usage-between/ta-p/200631</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonghpark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-03T09:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why there is difference in Elasticsearch store usage between Managed cluster nodes?</title>
      <link>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Troubleshooting/Why-there-is-difference-in-Elasticsearch-store-usage-between/tac-p/202033#M105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;great write up to a common question. Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/42262"&gt;@jonghpark&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.dynatrace.com/t5/Troubleshooting/Why-there-is-difference-in-Elasticsearch-store-usage-between/tac-p/202033#M105</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChadTurner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-10T15:03:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

