25 Mar 2019 06:56 AM - last edited on 13 Dec 2021 01:18 PM by MaciejNeumann
So, let's say I have a service-flow where I know (before deployment) is like
Service A-> Service B-> Service C-> Service D.
Good thing about Dynatrace over AppMon is that, it automatically let us know is it handle by the process itself (as I understand it, the 'foreground' thread?) or it is handle by other background thread.
Right now I able to see the truth, which is
Service A-> Service B
Background Thread of Service B -> Service C ->Service D
This is such a good news for the dev and ops, but too bad not so good for management and biz.....because in the service flow I don't see 'end-to-end', but instead two broken flow.
So I am wondering is there any way that we can "link" these two "Broken" service flow together into one?
Best Regards,
Wai Keat
25 Mar 2019 09:23 AM
It's not generally possible without changing the code of the monitored application. Typically those "requests in background threads" are some kind of background processing jobs, doing processing from queue / stack. The other services (web requests / web services / ... ) are pushing data into the queue / stack for further processing. The background execution may happen a long time after the "front-end" request has been processed.
So without changing the code, there is no correlation id and long gaps may happen between those executions.
25 Mar 2019 11:51 AM
Would Custom Service a possible option to explore?
Reason being, the application just migrated from AppMon to Dynatrace Managed. Back then the transaction flow in AppMon is end-to-end; but right now in Managed the service flow is 'broken' and doesn't stitch up.
28 Jul 2021 10:53 AM
Hello,
I have exactly the same issue. Our Service flow/purepath are broken as we are requesting external services inside another thread.
Our code is python and we use the amazing Python Auto instrument module to instrument our code https://github.com/dynatrace-oss/OneAgent-SDK-Python-AutoInstrumentation
I guess it is possible but not sure how. I can change my code if needed.
Thanks,
Alexandre