@ChristophHoyer @michaelwinkler To be honest, I think this should have been the starting point for Dynatrace. We're working on implementing Dynatrace Managed, and I keep getting surprised by issues - processes requiring a restart, disk space issues, you name it. For a monitoring solution, this is downright bad. How can we expect the users to have confidence in Dynatrace when we can't even monitor the basics of Dynatrace itself? This really needs to be done FAST. We're very happy with the information we're getting from Dynatrace, our users are very eager to start using it for real, but this is becoming a real threat to that success. It's coming to the point where I am starting to create Dynatrace monitoring in SCOM, just to keep from firefighting.
